Macworld Conference & Expo/New York - July 18-21

- Jacob K. Javits Convention Center, 
Report by David Kerwood, The Naval Undersea Warfare Center
kerwooddr@npt.nuwc.navy.mil

On 19 July 2000, I was privileged to attend the Macworld Conference & Expo at the Jacob K. Javits Center in New York City, representing the Naval Undersea Warfare Center
http://www.nuwc.navy.mil/ with press credentials supplied by the National Partnership for Reinventing Government http://www.npr.gov/. Getting to the I. M. Pei-designed Javits Center http://www.javitscenter.com/ in mid-town Manhattan was no problem from my home base in Rhode Island - AMTRAK's new Acela Regional train got my wife and I to Pennsylvania Station in just a little over three hours. The train beats driving through traffic any day, particularly since Penn Station is directly beneath Madison Square Garden and was just one block away from my hotel, which in turn was only a few more blocks away from the Javits Convention Center. Very convenient.

Speaking of the hotel, my local SATO representative had arranged for me to stay at the New Yorker
http://www.nyhotel.com/, a classic 30's era hotel located at 8th Avenue and 34th Street. The building itself had been in serious decline during the latter half of the 1900s, but was rebuilt and reborn as a "vertical village" in 1994. Kudos to the SATO staff and the hotel for covering the NYC per diem rate - though I still couldn't get them to honor my federal tax-exemption certificate (I've heard from other federal Macworld attendees that their hotels had no problem with this). The standard dataport modem connections were available in the room, though high-speed connectivity was not available. This service is becoming more and more common at major hotels in metropolitan areas in the US, with one of the more
common providers being CAIS DSL service that just requires an ethernet port or wireless networking built into the traveler's laptop
http://www.cais.com/hotel/.

The morning of the 19th was opening day for Macworld, and I hurried to the convention center to present my press credentials and receive my media badge. Some confusion at that early hour with those handling the crush of early arrivals relegated me to standing in a long line for a few minutes, and I was worried that I was going to be late for the Keynote Address by Steve Jobs, scheduled to start at 9:00 AM. Luckily an Expo rep came through the line asking for those who had already been pre-registered, a select group in which I was a member, thanks to the diligent efforts of Lee Wexel at OPM and Pat Wood at NPR. In short order I had my press credentials verified and media badge installed around my neck, and set off for the queue tent outside the convention center.

The media were out in force for this event, and our area under the tent was packed with representatives from every information venue available - magazine, freelance, web, radio, TV, print and more, from every corner of the planet. Everyone was checking out everyone else's badge - who you represented was prominently displayed front and center, and I was soon engaged in conversation with others milling about in line as we waited to be escorted into the main hall where the keynote address was going to be given. One individual in particular was extremely interested in what I thought was happening with the federal government and privacy issues, particularly in light of the recent revelations with the FBI's "Carnivore" device
http://www.fbi.gov/programs/carnivore/carnivore.htm). Carnivore is a Windows 2000 computer that uses custom software to eavesdrop on people who are the target of an investigation. Other than the fact that I didn't know any more about Carnivore than what anyone else would have read in the mainstream media, I did give my personal opinion that the federal government probably shouldn't be the biggest worry for those concerned with privacy issues. The real assaults on privacy would more likely be from the private sector arena, in my view. He seemed genuinely surprised to hear that view from a government employee such as myself, and I have no doubt he was subconsciously saying a dubious "yeah right" to my assertion.

The wait in the tent wasn't long, and soon after that our "handler" began shooing us in the direction of the main hall of the convention center. Kudos again to the Javits Center staff for maintaining excellent crowd control over the press horde - most regard the media as unruly at best at events like these, but plenty of staffers with big paddles that they were waving like traffic cops kept everyone in line, for the most part.


Overall the news from Apple heading into the conference was good - on the previous day Apple had just posted a $200 million profit for its third quarter 2000, with revenues of over $1.8 billion. It was the eleventh consecutive profitable quarter, with net profits up 43 percent. During the quarter, Apple sold 1,016,000 machines, including over 450,000 iMacs and 350,000 Power Mac G4 systems. The ingredients for further expansion – lots of cash flow and increasing market share - were certainly there. So there was a strong sense of expectation in the audience as we took our seats – the buzz was palpable from all within earshot (which is saying something since I don't hear too well to start with). Something big was afoot.

After packing the main hall with at least several thousand people (by my estimation), the keynote got under way with Apple / Pixar "iCEO" Steve Jobs on stage. Jobs immediately launched into his acknowledgment that, for the past two years, everyone has hated the round Apple mouse and the smallish keyboard that come standard with every Macintosh. To fix that, he introduced their replacements - an optical mouse with almost no moving parts that was housed in an elliptical transparent shell, and a wider keyboard with real page navigation keys. These were nice, but hardly the stuff of a keynote address, and Jobs soon began talking about the latest generation G4 machines, which were being introduced that day. These were big news, as two of the three versions of the G4s came with dual G4 PowerPC processors as standard equipment, and effectively redefine the edge of the envelope for high performance computing for the entire industry, regardless of platform or processor. According to Jobs, "Apple is the first to make dual processors a standard feature in high-performance personal computers." To illustrate the power of the new machines, Jobs and Apple Vice President of Worldwide Product Marketing Phil Schiller ran a Photoshop rendering operation of an Inspector Gadget movie poster. This would typically be a processor-intensive task that would normally prompt the user to go out for a cup of coffee while the operation ran its course. Side by side with the new dual-processor G4 was a top of the line 1000 MHz Pentium III machine, running the identical Photoshop operation. Both machines started concurrently, with the G4 finishing at 61 seconds while the PIII finished at 124 seconds. The difference was astounding to the graphic arts professionals in the audience (a core market for the Mac) and drew wild applause.

One thing that Jobs and Apple did not do was to come up with a strategy to effectively answer the years-old conundrum of marketing megahertz (MHz). This has been an issue that has been a thorn in the side of Macintosh resellers for years - trying to equate the processing power of the PowerPC chip in relation to the Pentium chip and its clones. It has always been an apples and oranges (excuse the pun) type of comparison - the IBM PowerPC processor that powers every Macintosh sold today is totally unlike the Intel-developed Pentium family of processors (RISC architecture vs. CISC architecture...more on that at the end of this article). Direct comparisons of the two kinds of processors aren't easily achieved in neat quantitative numbers that most consumers understand, like megahertz. It's like trying to equate the power output of a stick of dynamite vs. a gasoline engine in an automobile. Both can be expressed in quantitative terms like watts, joules, horsepower or fractions of kilotons, but the comparisons can be meaningless alongside each other since the way each item produces energy is so dissimilar. The same difficulty (though perhaps not as extreme as this example) can be seen when comparing the PowerPC vs. the Pentium - the two types of processors are too dissimilar to where a valid comparison can be made, at least in terms of simple megahertz.

In terms of a demonstrable effect such as the Photoshop rendering demonstration performed during the keynote, Jobs did note that the 500 MHz dual-processor G4 computer was about as powerful as a 2000 MHz (2 gigahertz - GHz) Pentium III, if such a machine existed (you can't buy a 2 GHz machine for any price in mid-2000 - there aren't any). This inability to do a direct comparison - megahertz to megahertz - has been a marketing bugaboo for Apple since the mid-eighties, and Jobs didn't have any answer for this dilemma.

Steve Jobs made a few more announcements, most notably that the new G4 machines have no price increase, even though they all come with gigabit (1000Base-T) ethernet and dual processors on the top two models as standard equipment. Jobs also gave a quick status report on OS X, the next generation of the Mac OS, announcing that it'll be released as a public beta in September 2000, and a public release in early 2001. A quick demo of OS X in action was greeted with plenty of oohs and aahs from the audience - it is visually stunning and full of tweaks and gadgets that will delight many.

The concentration of effort on the user interface was evident - an operating system that specifically designed to be as intuitive and unintimidating is it could possibly be while still able to get real work done. Nothing new there from a Macintosh point of view, but certainly a dramatic statement to anyone who has to wrestle with the Windows interface.

Bruce Chizen, the president of Adobe
http://www.adobe.com/ came on stage to declare Adobe's fierce commitment to the Mac, pointing to the aforementioned Photoshop shootout as an example of how close Adobe is working with Apple. Next came Kevin Browne from Microsoft, and his appearance probably had the most significance to those in the audience from the federal government - the announcement that Microsoft will be shipping Microsoft Office 2001 for the Macintosh in October 2000. While Office 2001 for Macintosh had been an open secret for some time before Macworld, Browne's demonstrations of the new tools and cleaner interface of the Office family of products was the first look at the new release for the vast majority in the hall. Browne stepped through the different modules of Office 2001, noting that Outlook Express is being replaced with a new telecommunications application called "Entourage." The major headline for Entourage was that it provided what Browne called "out of the box Palm support" - important news for the many Palm handheld computer users in the audience (from my seat I saw dozens of Palms being used for notetaking during the keynote). Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint were all being updated with new creation and usability tools, many of them Mac-specific. Kevin Browne made that point a running gag throughout his presentation - encouraging the audience to chant "...only for the Mac" with each new wizard, gallery, palette, etc. This is the stuff that you can only get through market share, and that market is doing very well, as Jobs was to point out later.

Federal users of Microsoft Office include many that would qualify for the title of "PowerPoint Ranger" - endemic in the Department of Defense, where people think nothing of firing up PowerPoint just to make a simple slide consisting of nothing but text. PowerPoint Rangers would then rejoice at the next bit of news from Browne - this new PowerPoint would include the ability to save a PPT presentation as QuickTime. We (DoD users, including myself) have been doing this for quite some time now, and it's a technique that's especially handy when web-enabling a PowerPoint presentation with a minimum of work. It's been a manual operation, however, with more than a fair share of tedium during the creation process and the announcement of a "save as QuickTime" capability was wildly cheered.

One unanswered question remained - cross-platform capability. While Kevin Browne stressed the compatibility issues between the Windows version of Office and the Mac version, all the new tools and gadgets in Office:Mac 2001 made me wonder about the compatibility and portability of Mac-created documents to the Windows platform. I would find it hard to believe that Microsoft would allow any serious incompatibilities between the Win and Mac versions, particularly if the Mac version were providing a functionality that the Windows version did not. Still, it's an item that I'll be looking hard at when I get my copy of Office:Mac 2001.

Ed Fries, vice president of games for Microsoft, and Bungie Software founder and CEO Alexander Seropian then came on stage to quell fears that Bungie would disappear from the Mac gaming universe, since Bungie Software's acquisition by Microsoft just a few weeks earlier. Both Fries and Seropian announced a Microsoft/Bungie "alliance" that was committed to bringing all of Bungie's games to the Mac, including the highly anticipated and too radical for words Halo
http://halo.bungie.com/. A demo video of the Halo game screen was then shown, and it was a sight to behold. With the Macintosh's built-in graphic display capabilities that far outstrip nearly any standard Windows PC, Halo for the Mac should prove to be the sine qua non for all computer games, regardless of platform.

Steve Jobs then regained control of the keynote for the second hour. Announcing the second birthday of the iMac, Jobs noted that 3.7 million of the units have been sold since their introduction at Macworld in summer of '98. He did the math - 1 iMac sold somewhere in the world every 18 seconds. Market share was the driver for all new Mac developments that were being seen during Macworld, and Jobs noted that over 44% of new iMac buyers were either new to computers, or crossovers from the Windows side. In essence, nearly half of all the iMacs being sold were going to people new to the Mac - no small achievement there. Increasing that market share drove the next announcement - Apple was returning to Circuit City as a major reseller for the iMac, iBook, and AirPort products, in nearly 600 retail stores throughout the U.S. Jobs then trotted out the new iMacs - four new models, new colors (important for the iMac market), and a new entry level iMac that was being billed as the perfect "internet appliance." The big news for the entry level iMac was the price - $799, for a machine that differed little in its functionality from the highest iMac available, the iMac DV Special Edition. What makes the price difference real for the higher-end iMacs was DV...digital video. The iMac has emerged as the single easiest way for anyone to get into the digital video arena, with the Apple Store and other resellers bundling the iMac DV with the Sony Elura DV camera for an "out of the box" digital video solution. What makes that all possible is the built-in FireWire (aka IEEE-1394) ports on every iMac DV, allowing for the camera to be plugged directly into and then controlled by the computer. Jobs announced that the software that makes this all possible - the free iMovie application included with every iMac DV - had also received a substantial upgrade, now tagged as "iMovie 2." iMovie and iMovie 2 are much more than basic cut and paste frame manipulation applications - tools for titling, effects, transitions, audio mixing and dubbing, and much more are included. While iMovie continues to be freely available, iMovie 2 will be a $49 upgrade.

In a dramatic display of real world use of thin-client (web-driven) applications, Jobs then demonstrated the ease of transforming digital video into video clips that could be displayed on a web page. Using the iTools HomePage
http://itools.mac.com/itoolsmain.html) suite of web building applications that are free to all Mac users, Jobs demonstrated how anyone with an internet connection and Mac OS running on their machine could build and field a very attractive web site, including text, images, and QuickTime video. This demonstration illuminated one particular track of the technology curve that begs further comment, however.

The iTools HomePage demonstrations took advantage of new software and capabilities that Apple maintains on their hardware. The client side (the user sitting at their machine at home or work) doesn't actually have any of this software on their own machine, aside from the basic iTools plug-ins for the web browser and OS. The fact that all the actual work of building the web page and assembling all the components of a web site is being accomplished without the use of any specialized software applications for the client is notable in its own right. Here is a good example of how thin-client architecture (DoD people like to call this network-centric computing) is slowly but surely wending its way into the lowest common denominator of computing nowadays - the household internet appliance.

The point here is that the only thing the desktop computer is being used for, once all the creative bits are done, is to provide and maintain an Internet connection for the client. It is essentially a dumb terminal when used in this fashion - think back to the days of DEC terminals, mainframes from Digital or IBM, and the use of the VAX operating environment. Twenty years ago there were three elements that were essential to government computing - the workstation, the mainframe, and the network that connected the two pieces together. Obviously in twenty years time all three elements have changed dramatically - the workstation is now more powerful than the mainframe was, the mainframe can now exist on a tabletop instead of needing its own building, and the network can support high speed throughput many
orders of magnitude more than dreamt of in the late seventies and eighties. The evolution of these three elements into what we see being used today means one thing to me - the death of standalone desktop machines as an end solution to government computing needs, and the resurgence and rebirth of network computing. The Navy has taken a big step in investigating the possibilities of network computing and thin client architecture for shipboard applications - that being the fielding of a fully networked thin client architecture on the USS Coronado (AGF 11), a command ship of U.S. 3rd Fleet. In that instance the Navy installed a central server computer with workstations distributed throughout the ship - just like what one would expect to see on Star Trek...a true "ship's computer." The full story can be found on the Navy Wire Service, at this url:
http://www.chinfo.navy.mil/navpalib/news/navywire/nws00/nws000530.txt

It is my personal prediction that while the 90s was a decade where we saw the explosive growth in speed, power, and capacity of the standalone desktop personal computer, this decade will witness the equally explosive growth of network computing - where most of the processing power and actually computing "work" takes place in a central server, not on the individual desktop machine. This is the direction I think enterprise level computing will gravitate to, for a variety of reasons but chiefly because of the cost factor. Centralize the computing power and you centralize much of the maintenance and manpower needed to keep enterprise level computing up and running. Maintaining thousands of standalone desktop computers has become stupifyingly expensive for all federal government activities, and replacing standalone desktop machines with highly capable workstations that need relatively little on-site maintenance is one way of containing those costs. Today every administrator in the public sector is searching for ways to reduce their IT support costs. A few years ago I heard Rich Kellet from GSA cite a statistic stating that greater than 50% of the federal infrastructure budget was for IT, with the inferred conclusion that this is an unsustainable number. An astounding statistic, from anyone's perspective. Containing cost is a major driver in the push towards exploiting the possibilities offered by thin client computing for the enterprise, and this is where the future will be taking the federal government, in my view.

Speaking of the future (and getting back on track with this article) the big news during Steve Jobs' keynote address was still to come. Jobs noted that the there was a hole in the desktop product line - the low end being filled by the iMac machines, with the high end amply taken care of with the smokin' G4 tower machines. But there was no mid-range computer in this lineup - something to put on the average user's desktop. Jobs then trotted out an entirely new product - the Power Macintosh G4 Cube. The Cube turned out to be a remarkably compact 8-inch crystal box, and packed a 450 or 500 MHz G4 processor, at least 64 MB of RAM, a minimum of a 20 GB hard disk, with FireWire, 10/100BaseT ethernet, USB, and a 56 Kbps modem. The Cube is preconfigured for wireless networking with a built-in Airport slot, and also sported a nifty slot-loading DVD drive on the top of the case, popping out a CD just like a toaster. One notable feature is that the Cube has no fan (like the iMac) so it's dead silent once the internal hard disk spins down. One thing the Cube doesn't offer are any expansion slots - unsurprising for a machine that is intended to fill the mid-range of Apple's desktop machines. The price was the next showstopper - the G4 Cube, now available from every Apple reseller, was pegged at $1800.

The price for the Cube doesn't include a monitor, though you can hook up any standard VGA unit to its video port. Jobs did take that opportunity to introduce three new monitors to the Apple lineup; all with built-in power, video, and USB in a single cable, reducing the cable clutter that accompanies every computer except the all-in-one iMac machine. The least expensive model was the $500 17-inch CRT Apple Studio Display, followed by the all-digital $1,000 15-inch flat-panel LCD Apple Studio Display. This is a miniature version of the giant-killer 22-inch LCD Apple Cinema Display, the largest flat screen monitor commercially available. This wide-screen display was also updated with the new all-in-one cable that incorporates USB, power, and video in one tidy cable.

By now it was nearly eleven o'clock, two hours into the keynote, and people were starting to mutter about missing sessions that were scheduled to begin elsewhere. A few actually got up and left, which turned out to be a huge mistake. Jobs proceeded to wrap up his presentation where he had started - with the new Apple optical mouse. He said that in appreciation of everyone who had managed to make it into the hall to hear him speak, he would give him or her a gift - the new mouse. All one had to do was to present a coupon to the Apple representatives at the back of the conference hall when they were leaving and they would get their boxed version of the new mouse, specially packaged for Macworld. A collective groan went through the audience, as everyone immediately realized that they didn't have the coupon and all thought (as did I) that they had somehow missed the giveaway in the crush to get into the keynote. Jobs enjoyed the moment, then said that if one didn't have the coupon (as nobody did) then they would find one taped under their seat. Immediately everyone in the hall dived under their chairs and ripped out the coupon, and then the fast thinkers in the room dashed towards the few empty seats and ripped those coupons out as well, ensuring that they would get more than one mouse. That ended the keynote, and the mass of humanity in the conference hall streamed to the exits to claim their new optical mouse.

In conversation with those around me as we filed to the exits, everyone agreed that this was one of the best keynote addresses ever at Macworld, both for the content and pure showmanship as well as the free mouse. The stream of product announcements, both from Apple and from Microsoft, spoke volumes as to the health of the company as well as to the robust retail channel. Again, market share and cash flow set the tone for the address - research, development, testing and engineering of new products and new technologies all depend upon ensuring that the bottom line stays healthy for both the near and far term. It was also painfully obvious that no announcements were made regarding any of the portable Macs - the iBook and the PowerBook, which also have a hole in the mid-range just as the desktop machines did. I would expect that hole is going to be filled by the next Macworld, which is on the West Coast in January 2001. The direction of R&D seemed clear enough - more power, smaller packaging, high-speed connectivity, and a keen eye towards improving the user interface and maintaining the Apple mandate of excellent industrial design were in abundance.

My own personal mandate now was lunch, and I met my wife for a quiet sit-down at a nearby Italian restaurant. One thing we noticed right away during the short walk through town was that people had been busy filling advertising billboards with ads for the new G4 cube - Apple wasn't wasting any time on trying to capture and capitalize on the buzz over the new machine. After going over everything that had happened during the keynote, her interest was piqued enough for her to join me in my cruise through the exhibition spaces for the rest of the afternoon. Upon returning to the Javits Center we headed straight for the Apple exhibit area, which occupied a large portion of the available floor space.

All the new machines were on display, and then some. Rows of monitors and flat screens, iMacs and G4 cubes, filled booths and perched on pedestals that were all surrounded by the crowd. It was readily obvious that the machines that were rolled out during the keynote were not mockups or prototypes - this was real hardware, and Apple reps were busily answering questions and taking orders. Of particular interest were two long booths with about twenty iMacs in each booth, and each iMac then hooked into a digital video camera mounted above it. It was clear that Apple was pushing the iMac as the digital video editing solution for the consumer market, and the crowds playing with the setups were thoroughly engaged in selecting clips and assembling videos, experimenting with transitions, fades and effects, all without reading manuals or getting bogged down in the interface.

Time was of the essence, however - I needed to see as much as I could before heading back home at the end of the day. A quick perusal of the floor layout was illustrative of how "busy" this Macworld seemed to be - all the available exhibition space in the main halls of the Javits Center seemed to be filled - there certainly was no lack of representation from the aftermarket, resellers, peripheral suppliers, and vendors of everything else in between. It wasn't just an Apple song and dance parade - I was pleasantly surprised to see a large exhibit area from Cobalt Networks
http://www.cobalt.com/, the makers of a highly-regarded line of UNIX/Linux servers that include the RaQ 4 and the Cobalt Qube (which looked a lot like the Apple G4 Cube in its form factor). Bravos for them for showing up at an Apple show - they looked like they were drawing a fair crowd themselves.

A rapid visit to as many booths and exhibits as I could manage in the time remaining forced me to skip many vendors which were of passing interest, but I did stop to ask some questions of the NEC rep, where they were displaying their full line of big screen CRT and flat screen LCD monitors. I wanted to hear the NEC spin on why their flat screen monitors (and everyone else's) are so expensive at the high end, with some approaching $8-9K for screens larger than twenty inches. Apple sells the biggest LCD screen, the aforementioned $3999 Apple Cinema Display. The NEC rep (whose business card didn't even have the NEC web site -
http://www.nec.com/ - printed on it...an epic gaffe in this day and age) went on about how difficult it was to manufacture large thin-film transistor screens, and their quality control was demanding that they dispose of 90% of their screens during the manufacturing process. NEC did have an excellent warranty of three years against any pixel burning out on their monitors - a fact of life with all liquid crystal flat panel displays. But did that justify such a huge price differential between the Apple products and theirs? I couldn't see it.

The Microsoft Exhibit area was mobbed - the news about the upcoming release of Office:Mac 2001 bore testament to that. There was one additional item of great importance to Federal users that was not discussed during the keynote. In the Microsoft display area was a hands-on exhibit of a major upgrade that's in the works for the Macintosh Outlook client for Exchange (the current version is v8.22). Discreetly positioned behind the Entourage presentation area, this version of Outlook (codenamed "Watson") is being driven to have near-total parity and compatibility with the Windows Outlook 2000 client, including all the calendering functions. This is big, big news for federal Mac users on Exchange email servers.

One important stop I needed to make was at the 4D booth. 4D (aka 4th Dimension -
http://www.4d.com/ makes highly capable and cross-platform database software development tools for enterprise level application environments, and the company had recently acquired the company that makes the web server software that I use at the warfare center, WebSTAR from StarNine Technologies, Inc. http://www.starnine.com/. The two companies were dissimilar enough to where the acquisition made people nervous - 4D was deeply committed to database applications, while StarNINE was just as deeply committed to their web server software product. What had emerged in the few months after the acquisition was that 4D could prove to be a formidable competitor to Filemaker, Inc. http://www.filemaker.com/ in the web database market. Many WebSTAR servers also run databases, which are served by Filemaker, and this has been a successful solution for some years now. Filemaker's new pricing structure was putting that future into question, however - the entry fee for fielding databases on the web had received a substantial jump when Filemaker v5.0 was rolled out in late 1999. The higher price for Filemaker now made the originally more-expensive 4D a viable competitor to this market, and when seen in that light the synergy between the 4D database market and the WebSTAR web server market started to make more sense.

Federal technology watchers will recognize the name WebSTAR. It was exactly one year earlier when the US Army decided that it had enough with their Windows NT/Cold Fusion web serving solution, which had been repeatedly been broken into by web site crackers from the outside. Army web managers had
gotten to the point to where the Army web site
http://www.army.mil/ was turning into the online version of a sailboat - a hole that you just pour money into without getting anywhere. In September 1999 the story broke that the Army had moved their web serving operation to Macintosh G3 machines
running WebSTAR, and to the best of my knowledge the web site cracking and break-ins that they had been dealing with for so long suddenly stopped cold, and continues with that enviable record to this day.

WebSTAR is the solution we use at the Naval Undersea Warfare Center as well, though this is limited to our own internal web where security is an even higher concern. We have been very pleased with the performance and flexibility of WebSTAR and the Macintosh operating system for web serving, and our security has never been compromised during the entire time that it has been in place. StarNine is now gearing up the next generation of WebSTAR to work with OS X, the next generation of the Mac operating system, and I had some conversation about that effort with Jay Gonzales, the business development manager for 4D. Jay had been with StarNine for some time, and we had corresponded via email several times in the past, but this was the first time I had ever had the occasion to meet him face to face. As far as the OS X effort was concerned, Jay reported that development of WebSTAR 5 was moving right along, and they were looking forward to the public beta release of OS X so they could expand their R&D to the WebSTAR beta test team. As before, web security remains one of the highest priorities in that effort,
with security being the one critical area that sets Macintosh web servers so far apart from their UNIX and WinNT competition.

One observation - there were relatively few presenters using projection units to demonstrate their wares. Nearly every presenter was using some form of flat panel display unit...typically these are gas plasma displays that cost anywhere between $8 to 20K. The presenter at the IBM booth that was demonstrating IBM's ViaVoice speech control software was typical of the scene - the flat panel display was a 48-inch wide unit that offered good resolution and visibility, even from a sharp angle to the screen. This is yet another indicator of where technology is going that will be of particular interest to those who have to give or prepare presentations in a conference room environment. The gas plasma display offers one dramatic
variation that isn't possible with a standard LCD projection unit - a wide screen format. PowerPoint will take advantage of the extra real estate if you tell it to do so, and this format can make for a dramatic visual
statement if used to its fullest effect.

Another item of interest occurred while walking through the exhibition halls - I noticed a vendor demonstrating a Palm V with a wireless modem to a small crowd that had gathered. I needed to see this one in action, and soon had the Palm handheld computer in my, um, palms. If you've never used a handheld computer, then this is an experience - the Palm computer
http://www.palm.com/ is about the size of a large deck of playing cards, and features a relatively large screen that accepts written characters using the machine's stylus. Apple used to have their own line of handhelds, the late and lamented Apple Newton which still commands a dedicated following of users. One hears a lot of talk today about web-enabled cellular phones, which are very popular in Japan and the Pacific Rim but which have not had
much of an impact in the United States. The chief drawback to web-enabled cell phones has to do with their screen size (very tiny) and the fact they are limited to basic text displays. Handhelds like the Palm, on the other hand, have a relatively large screen and can display graphic images as well, on standard web pages.

On-the-go connectivity with handhelds has been something of a nuisance until recently, however, requiring the use of bulky modems and cables to connect the handheld to a wireless network, where coverage (or lack of coverage) has historically been a problem. Palm recently introduced a fully wireless Palm with a built-in modem, the Palm VII, which then connects to the Internet via the wireless modem and built-in antenna using the Palm.Net service. This new unit lists for about $450, however, and there is a huge installed base of standalone Palm machines that could be used for wireless connectivity with
email and web access, if they only had a modem which didn't act like a boat anchor when it was installed. That modem was the thing that caught my eye in the exhibition hall - the OmniSky Wireless Modem
http://www.omnisky.com/ fit neatly into the back of a Palm V and connected to the OmniSky wireless network in Manhattan at about 19 Kbps - not terrifically fast, but passable for email and standard web pages. I tried the unit out and was connected to my web site http://www.nuwc.navy.mil/ in seconds, and I was pleasantly surprised and impressed to see true graphic images appear on the Palm screen. One unanswered question remained which the rep on the floor wasn't prepared for - how well the OmniSky network worked with 128-bit encryption and Microsoft Outlook for Exchange. That'll take some further research, and I have subsequently learned that OmniSky requires POP3 email accounts, which have to be specially enabled for MS Exchange email servers. My first experience with the OmniSky wireless modem for the Palm handheld computer was good enough for me to be optimistic about the future of handheld wireless communications, though I still take a dim view of receiving email on a cell phone (an awful thing to behold).

The end of the day came all too quickly for my investigative side, and not quickly enough for my feet. By the time we had to go, we were loaded down with lots of literature and plenty of freebies and trinkets that vendors practically threw at you when you approached. I did make one concession to comfort - that being a spot purchase of a four-wheeled computer bag from Tutto
http://www.tutto.com/ that proved to be a lifesaver at the end of the day. This was a great little unit that beats the pants off of any other wheeled bag that I've ever used - if you have to travel with a laptop then this "office on wheels" is highly recommended. The wheels held up well in the walk back to Penn Station - which also proved to be interesting where one quickly formed an impression of the state of the art regarding ADA compliance for New York streets and curb cuts. While there were many curb cuts at busy intersections, there were also many curbs that didn't have them. If I were in a wheelchair there were quite a few curbs that would have been a challenge to negotiate.

A short wait for the Amtrak Northeast Direct train (which turned out to be twenty minutes late getting into the station) and we were soon back home. In going through my notes and in research after returning to Rhode Island, several data points and takeaways loom large:

* This Macworld ranked as the second most attended IT Event in New York, setting a new all-time attendance record for an East Coast Macworld by attracting 61,250 attendees from around the world.
* More than 7,000 people physically attended the keynote, with more than 4,000 packed into the main hall at the Javits Center. Thousands more watched the keynote via webcasting on the Internet.
* The educational conference program drew more than 4,000 attendees to the more than 110 sessions.
* Nearly 400 exhibitors filled more than 294,000 gross square feet of exhibit space. Major vendor categories included Hardware and Peripherals, Music & Audio, Assistive Technology, Quicktime and Multimedia, Education, Scientific Research and Development, Internet, and Application Development.
* A reflection of the burgeoning Mac market is evident, yielding an increase of more than 33% over last year's New York total of 45,000 attendees. The all-time attendance record is the Macworld Conference & Expo/San Francisco, which set a new all-time attendance record of 85,000 attendees in January 2000. The next semi-annual Macworld Conference & Expo will be held at San Francisco's Moscone Center, January 9-12, 2001.
* Apple is flush with cash, and their financial position is solid. The company has not let up on the fielding of new machines and technologies that represent the leading edge in information systems hardware and software. Apple is looking ahead on two fronts - deploying an enormous amount of sheer horsepower in the G4 Macintosh, and positioning these machines to work on either end of the thin-client architecture scheme - both as high-speed servers as well as powerful clients, connected via high-bandwidth networks. Having gigabit ethernet connectivity as standard equipment on all the new G4 machines illustrates the importance of high-speed network applications for enterprise-level computing to Apple. No other PC manufacturer offers this on their base systems.
* The continuing expansion of processing power as evidenced by the new G4 machines recalls the old debate of RISC vs. CISC architecture. RISC - the Reduced Instruction Set Computing architecture that is the basis for the IBM-developed PowerPC processor used in the Macintosh - continues to leap forward in capability due to the benefits derived from efficiency, power usage, and flexibility in design. CISC - the Complex Instruction Set Computing architecture that defines the design of the 808x/Pentium family of processors - is showing its age as a legacy system, where the laws of physics are getting in the way of continued development of the Pentium processor.
* Perhaps the easiest way of visualizing the differences in efficiency between the PowerPC and the Pentium can be found by simply looking at the heat sinks for each processor - the heat sink (a finned aluminum casting that dissipates heat from the CPU) for the iMac CPU is about the size of a book of matches. The heat sink for a Pentium-family CPU is typically about the size and heft of a cell phone at a minimum – the Pentium family of processors put out a lot of heat. The next generation of processors from Intel will likely abandon much of the current architecture and design in the present-day Pentium - the physical limits of the chip are stifling future expansion. Both architectures (RISC and CISC) are moving toward a more common ground in design and manufacturing, but in many respects the PowerPC is already there, while the successor to the Pentium is starting late out of the gate.

This year's Macworld Expo and Conference proved to be exceedingly valuable for me, where one of my responsibilities at the Warfare Center is to keep a finger on the virtual pulse of information technologies of all types. These technologies were deployed and displayed in abundance at Macworld in New York, and I left the conference with an even greater appreciation of how fast the technological advances of Information Systems are coming - it will be an interesting time for any federal IT manager as they try to keep pace with this accelerating curve.

To discuss further information about this report, please contact David Kerwood, The Naval Undersea Warfare Center http://www.nuwc.navy.mil/

The full text and images for this story can be found on the web at this url:
http://www.nuwc.navy.mil/hq/webmaster/reports/macworld/macworld2000.html